The Marketing Lever
The Marketing lever is the 5th of the 10 levers, held separate from overhead because marketing is a trade of today's profit for tomorrow's potential revenue.
Why it is not overhead
Overhead keeps today running. Rent, insurance, the software the team logs into on Monday. Stop paying it and the business stops working this month.
Marketing is a trade of today's profit for tomorrow's potential revenue.
Same profit and loss statement, opposite jobs. Overhead is the cost of operating. Marketing is profit spent on purpose to buy demand that has not arrived yet. Cutting them with the same knife is how growth dies in the name of discipline: the founder tightens across a category, marketing goes down with the rest of it, and 2 quarters later the pipeline that was supposed to fund the recovery is empty.
That is why marketing comes out of overhead and stands on its own, 5th of the 10 levers.
The 3 tags
A single marketing number cannot be managed, because 3 genuinely different kinds of spend sit inside it and each one is judged on a different clock. Tag every marketing dollar as one of the 3.
Above the line and below the line are the advertising trade's terms for broadcast versus direct response. They are not the profit and loss statement's gross profit line, which is a different use of the same words.
Above the line: Branding
Buys tomorrow's positioning and demand. Payback lands beyond 365 days, so branding spend is measured in positioning terms and judged annually, never held to cost of acquisition.
Some of it buys compounding assets: content, search and answer-engine visibility, community. A library of published pages keeps earning after the month it was made in, which a run of ads does not. Note that as a property of the spend, not as a 4th bucket. It is still branding.
Below the line: Performance marketing
Measurable direct response. Payback lands inside the period, so performance marketing is held to cost of acquisition and return math monthly, without mercy.
If a channel cannot be measured on that clock, it does not belong here. It is branding, and it should be tagged and judged as branding rather than defended with numbers that were never really there.
Relationship
Bought proximity to people. Memberships, conferences, events, travel, the dinner table. It is neither broadcast nor measurable response, founders spend heavily here, and most books have nowhere honest to put it.
Measured the only honest way there is: named relationships and what they turned into, reviewed yearly. Not impressions, not leads. A list of people, and what came of knowing them.
The border with the Owner's Piggy Bank™
Relationship spend runs along the edge of the Owner's Piggy Bank™, and it sorts on the same question that entry uses: who is this for?
Would a hired CEO keep this spend for the relationships it produces?
If yes, it is relationship marketing and it belongs to this lever. If no, it is piggy bank wearing a marketing costume. That is fine; you own the business, and that is one of the perks. It only has to be tagged that way, because a piggy bank filed as marketing makes the lever unreadable in both directions at once: the marketing looks less efficient than it is, and the piggy bank looks smaller than it is.
What the tags are for
They decide which question you are allowed to ask.
Ask branding spend for its cost per acquisition and you get a number that means nothing, and the spend usually gets cut on the strength of it. Let performance marketing coast on the promise of long-term positioning and you get a channel nobody has audited in a year. Same dollars, opposite failures, and both come out of one untagged line called Marketing.
Tagged, the annual question stops being a size question and becomes a mix question. Not "is our marketing budget too big," but "what share of it is buying tomorrow, what share is buying this month, and what share is buying people."
What the right mix is for a specific business depends on its margins, on how long its buyers take to decide, and on how many days it has on the Cash Shot Clock™ to wait for tomorrow to arrive. That mix is a reading of one business, not a rule, and it is the kind of question a CFO Huddle™ exists to answer.
The first conversation is the CFO Huddle™. $850, 45 minutes, one finding, and what we'd do about it.
Knowing the number is the easy half. The Huddle is where a CFO looks at your actual financials and tells you what this one is saying about your business.
The Measure discipline of the MEASURE × HACK™ Method.
Published